// AI-Generated Assessment
function testReactDev() {
const skills = ai.extract(jd);
return generate(skills);
}const assessment = {
role: "Senior React Dev",
challenges: 4,
time: "45 min"
};The Complete Technical Assessment PlatformFrom one job description to a proctored, AI-graded assessment in minutes — no LeetCode puzzles, no scheduling hell
The fastest path from 'we need to hire' to 'we know who to hire'. No manual setup, no scheduling coordination.
Job description
Senior React Developer — FinTech
We need a React expert for our payment dashboard. Must know TypeScript, Redux, API integration, unit testing and performance optimisation…
Drop in your job posting — or pick from a template. AI extracts required skills, seniority signals, and role context. No manual configuration needed.
In a few minutes: coding challenges, a code-review block, voice Q&A, and AI-assisted-development judgment — all tuned to your exact role. Edit, reorder, or add questions before sending.
// Challenge: Implement a payment form with Stripe validation
They enable camera and screen share, then move through a guided warmup, a real code editor, and a voice recorder — auto-saved with offline support. A serious, proctored experience candidates take seriously.
Per-block scores, code evolution snapshots, behavior timeline, and integrity signals. AI grades every question type — make a confident call in minutes, not days.
Challenge Types
Mix any of these into one assessment — AI generates and grades them all from your job description. Voice and video evaluation are English-only for now.
Your AI assistant wrote this auth fix and all tests pass. A teammate says "just ship it." What do you do?
Caught the security gap the AI and the teammate both missed. Treats AI output as a draft, not gospel.
The skill that actually defines the job now: judgment with AI. Real scenarios test when to trust AI output, when to push back, and how to review AI-generated code — the competency no other platform measures.
Real problems in 14 languages — JavaScript, Python, Java, Go, React, SQL and more. Candidates write code in a VS Code-like editor against hidden test cases, re-run and scored on our servers so a result can't be faked.
Candidates review intentionally buggy code — identify issues, suggest fixes, explain their reasoning. AI scores their analysis against ground truth, testing the judgment that separates senior engineers from the rest.
"Design a rate-limiting system for 10M daily API requests"
Ask about system design, architecture trade-offs, or debugging. Candidates record a spoken answer; AI transcribes and evaluates the content — no scheduling, no back-and-forth. Spoken evaluation is English-only for now.
It's 6pm before a release. A teammate's PR has a bug blocking the deploy and they look stuck. What do you do?
Unblocks the team over protecting ego or the clock. The instinct that scales past one engineer.
Realistic workplace moments — a blocked release, a teammate's messy PR, a tight deadline. Single-select judgment calls, AI-scored, that surface how someone actually behaves on a team.
A timed, guided recording — candidates introduce themselves or respond to a custom prompt. Auto-transcribed and shared with everyone reviewing the hire. Transcription and evaluation are English-only for now.
Integrity & Proctoring
Every assessment is proctored end to end. Candidates turn on their camera and share their screen before they start — and every score is re-checked on our servers, so a tampered browser can't fake a pass.
Candidates enable their webcam and share their full screen for the whole assessment. Both are captured and available to reviewers.
Tab switches, clipboard pastes, focus loss and missing-face moments are tracked and rolled into an integrity score — the AI flags suspicious behaviour automatically.
Every code submission is re-run on our servers against the real test suite. Candidates can't tamper with their score client-side — the number you see is the number we computed.
Code-evolution snapshots and a behaviour timeline show exactly how a solution was built — not just the final answer.
Platform
Everything you need to run technical hiring end to end — and nothing you don't.
Paste a JD — or pick a template — and AI builds the entire assessment: challenges, scenarios, and voice questions tuned to the exact role. No question bank to curate, no manual setup.
Spoken answers, code-review comments, written responses, judgment scenarios, and test results — all scored automatically. No manual rubrics, no subjective guesswork.
A live pipeline (invited → started → completed → reviewed), a 'needs attention' queue, stalled-candidate detection, and one-click reissue of expired links. You manage the whole funnel, not just the test.
Beyond a score: a clear Strong Hire / Hire / No-hire call with the reasoning behind it — so you walk into the decision already informed.
Upload your logo and the assessment plus every candidate email carries your company's name. Candidates feel like they're interviewing with you, not a third-party tool.
Magic-link access with no install, a guided warmup, a real editor with auto-save and offline recovery, and a calm finish. When the experience feels professional, candidates perform at their real level.
HackerRank, Codility, and TestGorilla only test one thing. QuizMaster tests how candidates code, review, communicate, and work with AI — and grades it all automatically.
QuizMaster
Challenge Types
Coding, code review, voice Q&A, AI-assisted dev, team scenarios & video
Assessment Creation
AI generates the whole assessment from a JD in minutes
AI Grading
Coding, code review & voice — all auto-graded
Candidate Experience
Warmup flow, VS Code editor, auto-save
Analytics
Behavior timeline, code evolution, integrity score
Setup Time
Minutes, not hours
Others
Challenge Types
Coding tests only
Assessment Creation
Manual selection from static library
AI Grading
Pass/fail test cases only
Candidate Experience
Basic text editor, no guidance
Analytics
Final score only
Setup Time
1–3 hours
What teams are saying
“We used to spend 3 hours picking questions and still weren't confident they were the right ones. Now we paste a JD and have a better assessment in a few minutes. The code review blocks alone filter out candidates who would have looked fine on paper.”
“The voice Q&A blocks replaced our first-round phone screens entirely. We send the assessment, get back structured responses, and only talk to people who already demonstrate system design thinking. It cut our time-to-hire by three weeks.”
“I can see exactly how a candidate built their solution — not just the final answer. The code evolution snapshots caught people who submitted solutions they clearly didn't understand. That's saved us from several bad hires.”
Flexible plans for teams of all sizes. Cancel anytime.
For small teams running their first real assessments
For growing engineering teams hiring at scale
For large organizations with custom requirements
Still have questions? Talk to us
Join 500+ engineering teams running smarter technical interviews with QuizMaster.
SOC 2 Compliant · GDPR Ready · No credit card required